One Hour One Life Forums

"Invalid or unexpected token."
I also cannot open README because it is some odd file type.

If someone has a problem with it, they should just leave or suicide.

AFK daughters won't run off, get bit by animals (as long as you provide an item for their tile, maybe a fire). Maybe bake things or make stew by yourself which you use to feed the girl and you.

I'm glad some in-game ladies stayed to AFK instead of suicide, they sometimes save a lineage.
One time our only woman suicided as she had to leave; we died out because of it, if only she had stayed to AFK.

I want to second this.
Not being efficient all the time is another thing than having fun at the expense of others. If one gets iron and crafts themselves a shovel, they can do whatever they want with it in my books - the item exists because of their work. However, if a villager just takes a random shovel and starts using it, they basically just profited from someone else's work of hauling it in the first place (and processing the ore, smithing, getting the handle...). If people keep taking and not providing, the balance will tip and the town suffers. You gotta get things, not just use them. If you use things, get things for the town as a payment for it. Made a graveyard with rose bushes? Maybe do an iron run or get some tool handles as thanks. Someone else will have to do it anyways, so you could, as someone else had done for you before.

Regarding the title of this topic; if you have a weapon, you can kill. You can kill as a tryhard, or you can kill a tryhard. Getting killed over things is not fun, but it's simply a fact that it happens and will keep happening: no matter how we tell people to chill, there will be a moment when someone ends up killing in frustration.

Maybe we should start making more pads and needles with thread to deflect some of the stabbings.

It's just wilderness, like any other Eve start but with no chance to stumble across ruins or non-cursed players as the coordinates shift further and further every time.

They messed up the quote, it should've been fragilityh14's quote.

Well, I heard this update is not done yet, so maybe it takes a nice turn in the end. Let's see.

Anyways, it seems that the meta started it all. People got bored of the "warmth, swamp, green biome" combo and got nothing out of buildings or clothes. People wanted clothes to be more important/useful as they were fed up with staring at old people's genitals (or something) and being cooked up in desert towns. People wanted a buff for buildings. So of course the quick answer is...
...make everything so hostile you need to make clothes and build buildings.
I think instead of that it should've been...
...add things to the game which make clothes SUPER GOOD (like no snake bites if clothed! Less fatal injuries if clothed!) and houses SUPER GOOD (like a bonus when inside a house so we can converse more and have parties indoors! Items don't decay indoors!).

This kind of "make stuff really harsh to make other things useful" is, to me, a bad approach. But I'm not the designer of the game so I'll just sit back and hope for the best.

Important=/=necessity. Now they are a necessity. I want clothing to be useful and important, something to go for, a new bottleneck to pass, but it is way too big of a requirement now and super early too when everything is important.
I'd rather have it like this;
location>food>tools>clothes. Clothes would be a bottleneck around sheep time. If nobody makes clothes before that, the place won't get sheep.
Now it's;
clothes>food>tools>location, isn't it?

This didn't make clothes just important, it made them a necessity. I didn't want that. But, I am waiting for the update to be finished. It's impossible to debate about an update if it's not finished.

That's good news and I don't mind naked people grilling themselves in desert. What I think is odd is that there is no place to live without clothing; clothing isn't a necessity for us irl, we do have ideal temperature environments. When jungle was added, Jason said he wanted it to be the ideal biome, makes sense, lots of reed skirt tribes in jungles, but now it grills everyone like desert? I wouldn't mind having one ideal temperature biome to kick off with so we have time to invest in clothing.
And yes that's the thing, it needs tweaking, it's a partial update, there is a disconnection issue; I won't play. I want it fully done first.

We will never know 100% was someone a griefer or not (unless they say they are). They might have been purposefully damaging a place, or they were clueless about the harm they did.
If they purposefully damaged the place=griefer.
If they unintentionally damaged the place=not a griefer, no matter what people say.
Everyone has the freedom to decide who they see as griefers in-game, because we can never tell for sure. However, saying someone is a griefer means you have decided they are doing harm purposefully from your point of view. If you can't say they did it with purpose, you shouldn't call them a griefer. But people throw the term around and it loses its meaning.

Well okay, so people who someone may call a griefer (falsely). I just want to be clear that a player who is labeled as a griefer because they cause harm is wrong, because it has to be a player who intentionally causes harm.
But yes, my opinion on people who unintentionally cause harm with griefer-level damage;
they're fine, but if they keep doing it, they should be stopped. If they can't be stopped (no response, or they outright refuse to stop), people are free to kill/curse them with no regret. If you are harmful, you are harmful, that's all.

Once I had a life where a girl like this got stabbed; she was just a total noob, clueless, although she was responsive. She just kept doing massive mistakes in high population low gen camp (cut down multiple important trees nearby, stood in front of smith, took tools, got salt water, put berries in baskets etc.). Some suspected she was playing dumb, some thought she was just terribly new. Nobody took time to teach her, but she kept trying things and it usually ended in damage. Someone stabbed her while I was away (gathering iron to chill by myself since she screwed my smithing with her head in the way all the time) and I was honestly glad she wasn't there anymore. Could smith again. Although someone was instantly after the woman who stabbed the clueless girl.

I wonder if it will ever happen. I remember Jason saying he finds it way too fun to have the "ohshi-" moment when a mom pops out even more kids as she still has her hands full with other babies.
I do hope that is not preventing us from getting birth control.

Hopefully the twin lineage ban is implemented soon.

I have heard people say they will exploit and grief with things until they grab Jason's attention. Childish action, yes, but they say that. When there is a murder exploit in the game, people will catch on, and then it spreads like wildfire. The only good thing about this wildfire is that Jason will hear about it. It's just sometimes painfully slow with the fixing. Last time we had note arrows and butter knives, and I noped the heck away from the game until they got fixed.
Right now I'm being super passive with OHOL because snowballs are still in (and apocalypse) - I don't want to put myself in there, I'm better off doing other things.

I can only wonder what kind of magic a vajayjay possesses here.

Sure, systems need balancing and fixing. And again, Jason is sometimes terribly slow when it comes down to taking action. He likes to think it through I guess.

What I've learned about him is that he enjoys drama. He thinks it's spicy when people have conflicts, get frustrated with each other and cause issues to each other. With this I am referencing to his defense over cursed babies and moms fighting to raise them - was not fun or cool in-game. It was terrible. He also wants us to deal with a lot of things, such as guarding and such, which sucks, as I hate being a babysitter-- I mean a guard to others.

It's online, it has blood, it has knives, it has people. Sure, it doesn't tell you much about the community as the advertisements are about the GAME itself, not its people. This can happen with any online game. Say, you buy Overwatch, looks cool and fun - but wait, all the fun is drained because the game is filled with trolls who use exploits and imbalances to steamroll everyone. Sure, that should be fixed, but it's not like the game can explain that to you when you visit its store page. No PvP tag as this game is not PvP and killing was implemented so players can get rid of griefers who ruin resources and projects - would suck to watch a griefer break all your tools and kilns and you just have to watch it happen. Killing has to be there, and some people will try to use it all the time for their own entertainment; continuous PvP.
And sure this game is constantly updated and worked on, but there was some explanation which made OHOL a fully released game. It just gets content added and sadly Jason has no testers... So it's the whole community enjoying the quirks of updates. Which is bad, yes. Sometimes there are things you can't even cover with extensive background research, but hey, at least Jason is active.

More about Atticus' life: I raised all my kids and probably every other lady did too. Yes the camp was screwed, but when the situation peaked with 22 females alive in the lineage, I camped further north with my babies and raised them there, eating cacti and wild foods while making useful stuff (like tools and pump kits=kindling packs) and dropped them to the camp for those who stuck in the camp during the peak. I told all my kids that the camp is south but it's crowded and that they'll die to starvation if they go there. Most kids listened and stayed with me until I decided we can go see how it's coming along - I made sure they had baskets full of food before we went, and I showed cacti spots along the way so they can run back to them if the camp is a death trap.

At the start of Atticus' life we had quite a healthy number of females:

Then it peaked with 22 females in total during my fertile years.

And yet this is how it was in the end:

So it balanced itself out perfectly. Yes some resources got exhausted due to the jump in population, but the most clever girls knew when to take off and avoid famine, and came back when it was more stable. Newbies and farm-relying people starved away which made room for farm to recover.
You don't have to abandon or kill kids. You can, it's fine, but as long as you have smart girls, they'll make it. High population doesn't mean death sentence for sure.

http://lineage.onehouronelife.com/serve … id=2696947 (last girl died to rattle snake)