One Hour One Life Forums

Because the basic assumption is, the positive forces to still outweight the negatives by a fair amount. Once the destructors woulbe be in the majority  it's over anyway, nothing would and should stop them there.

Well if three come together and just strangle someone.. in the woods? Well it wouldn't be so hard for them to get their hands on a (stolen) weapon anyway. So I don't see a big difference there... In town.. well many people would see them, and again, it wouldn't be soo hard to get their hands on a knife/bow&arrow anyway.

The issue is if a negative minority (or single person) can seriously disrupt a vast majority without them being able to do much about it.

Yet in naturally shows as "emoticon"... possibly evolution made it that way with a reason.

Or..... have more than one combo-possibility to create compost other than berries+carrot+wheat.

Or.... at least have a full berry bush making a full pot from any empty one, however you still fill them one by one for already picked bushes if someone picked already some.

I'd suggest keeping the normal biome mix for startups but add mega-biomes with some special treat in their center to build a dedicated city/village/output there.

See also
https://www.reddit.com/r/OneLifeSuggest … l_trading/

Actually I seen newer players forget about the additional blocking tile that needs to be behind the bush. Otherwise the sheep can "jump over it".

Basically animals can walk/jump 1-4 tiles in any direction as long there is no blocker inbetween and the destination is free. This is the way the bush corners work. They can't jump out of it, because of the blocker one way further and can't jump onto it because of the bush.. But sometimes players assume, the bush already blocks them.

As I understood, baby slings are a pretty old request. Anyway, I'd like them as an alternative to a backpack (so either carry a baby or 4 items).

Ok I get it's fairly easy for a griever to get it down in this state, because of axe/hatched.

But still, it doesn't despawn right?

Singular nomadic life is actually pretty easily possible, biggest issue is a concentration fault to step on a snake or boar (or mosquitoes if you have clothes). Honestly I consider it also pretty boring, this is why I suppose not many do this. It reduces the game basically to a 90s avoid bad stuff and gather coins side scroller...

As a smaller group with some tools (backpacks and even carts) it is theoretically also very possible. Including settling down a short while, while just munching natural food sources to craft a few things and then carry on.

Really organizing this with random co-players I'd consider close to impossible. First players have the meta and mind and will start fire, gooseberry farm etc.  Secondly even if you agree not to go with the meta, you'd have to dedicate jobs on a temporary settlement well (you two go and keep brining food milkweed you find, you go and get rabbits). Thirdly it is very easy to lose each other when moving (very limited field of view of official client and no "homemarker" as the standard reference point  of a settlement to always find the others again)

Does exist, google melanesian

PS: fair enough, I'll delete the reddit suggestion until a fair majority seems to agree on some variation on the topic to consider in more depth, I see different variants that all would accomplish the same thing and yes it does not need to be *everyone* (looking at a certain person).

PPS: At the end it's jason calls what he wants the game to be. I personally just operated under the assumption... better to market to a somewhat wider audience, if it is supposed to be a unforgiving thingy with a steep learning curve at the beginning which gets longer and longer as the game gets more stuff, also fair enough, than this is the way he wants to move his work to cater for a specific niche.

Agreed, but please can we not advertise effective griefing strategies? I prefer most of them try to murder everyone with a knife.