One Hour One Life Forums

Windmills use wind and do not require a river, what you mean is a watermill.

Dunno what the first "machine" was, depends on how you define the term "machine" tough. Pretty much gray area on the lower end.

Tested it further, nope, broke, while it works fine with crops, now bowl with water + partial bucket with water (1 use) = empty bucket.

Dang!

And with this file the last use of partial bucket to empty bucket works as well.

Just need to figure out full bucket to partial bucket now.

Sorry this is IMO nonsense in multiple ways. It's not a container, it's an item with uses and in case of bowl and waterpouch mapped to category "portable water source".

 OneLifeData7$ git diff categories/394.txt 
diff --git a/categories/394.txt b/categories/394.txt
index 474b9fcf..1debe714 100644
--- a/categories/394.txt
+++ b/categories/394.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 parentID=394
-numObjects=2
+numObjects=4
 210
-382
\ No newline at end of file
+382
+660
+1099
OneLifeData7$ 

If I define bucket of water and partial bucket of water it works already!

Mostly. It works with partial buckets of water with more than 1 use left, and it does reduce the amount of water in the bucket! However out of some reason I cant yet use the bucket with 1 use left (which would turn it into an empty bucket) and also the full bucket stays full making it an infinite water source, which also not desired.

I suppose there is still 2 transitions missing for this to work directly on the bucket?

Honestly I don't understand the system fully, yet.

But unless I'm missing something big, I don't see why this shouldn't work with minimal changes.

Haha just that term alone.

kiln + pickaxe = adobe rubble
adobe rubble + water of bowl = 1 adobe

The only thing I'd take care of is to make anybody near the smith or even working there aware you move it, and to have already the new kilns in place until you destroy the old smith. Otherwise they think you're a griefer.

BTW: A pen shouldn't IMO be larger than someone without zoom mod seeing the full thing at once... otherwise even well intended people can't tell well anymore how many shorn/unshorn sheep there are.

Challenge accepted!

(See Tarrs birthing prison...)

Well this is not even the biggest issue, at least if you make it to buckets the distance doesn't matter so much. But if the main village is right in the cold greenlands I tend to suicide as well if it's obvious this is an early gen village and my mother (likely to noob Eve) doesn't have a surname..

PS: I believe on should be able to /die at any stage of life (e.g. due to imprisonment or due to having to leave because of IRL things) If below 3 -> SID, if = or above -> hearth attack.

So you can make one tech tree branch to a mean pit bull car army to attack a whole town?

Well I'll just wait to see what the update brings before I give my comment on it.

My impression is, what is tried to achieve is more interaction between towns and better transportation ought to make this more doable. The bigger issue tough is, there is no (good willed) incentive to interact with another town as each and every is 100% self contained.

There isn't even relative production benefits of other places. Forgot how it was called in economy theory it's been a while, but it was shown that even if place 1 is more productive with good A and B than place 2, but on place 2 for example good B is relatively more efficient to make than A, while on place 1 it's the other way around, still both places gain by trading.

Sorry, lets start with extremely same starting point, to make it clear:

Starting point: You got one wooly sheep and one bowl of berries/carrots.

Action scenario one:
1. Sheer the sheep.
2. Feed the shorn sheep

-> Result: 1 wooly sheep, 1 fleece.

Action scenario two:
1: Feed the lamb.
2. Sheer one sheep.

-> Result: 1 wooly sheep, 1 fleece, 1 dung and 1 shorn sheep (worth 4 mutton)

Just by turning around the order of things in a way to never have all sheep shorn you get way more output.

Yes I'm all in favor of changing the game physics in this regard. But as it stands the difference is that bad.

Weeeell it depends on how the population per lineage factor is changed or kept.

Instead of spawning lots of new lineages it would also be possible to allow existing lineages to grow and shrink in numbers instead of creating lineages and wiping.

Also I'd wish in case lineages have to get removed as player numbers shrink there would be some mechanism to have the more successful or the more circumspect survive (i.e. getting the valuable new births). Right now its more or less pure RNG...

Dogs are uncool, it would be cool to make them cool next to their only current use which is griefing... like give them any use or make them at least a more permanent accessory to a town.