One Hour One Life Forums

a multiplayer game of parenting and civilization building

You are not logged in.

#201 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 22:57:09

Booklat1 wrote:

I've calculated for the same value of costs, crumpaloo. This is just pip efficiency-wise. The only reason i even considered number of bites is because you keep dismissing it as important in pip efficiency which it obviously is as can be demonstrated comparing a mutton pie with an hypotetical food with 40 food in one bite. Or 40 bites of 1 to a total of no waste ever.


If you dismiss all the other information, Alias is still right, you need to waste some rabbit pie and not waste rabbit berry at all for them to be on the same level. Entirely about pip efficiency, and you're still incorrect.

Pip efficiency is just defined as the less pips in one use of a food the less likely the pips from that food will be wasted, so when i say a food is more pip efficient, that means that its less wasteful. The amount of of items or bites of a food is a completely different factor then pip efficiency, so when Alias is bring in these new 2 new factors to refute one factor like you've done with your formula that doesnt tell me that the effects of pip efficiency arent valid, that just tells me you guys are trying to bring in forgein factors to win a argument that i never disputed in the first place, so no not incorrect, inefficient.

#202 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 22:35:19

Booklat1 wrote:

I just told you the threshold in which berry rabbits become better than the alternative Alias gave. That's with the same costs so this can be dismissed. This is entirely about pip efficiency, you have to waste 4 pips of every bite of rabbit pies and eat 6 berries with no waste for it to be worse than berry rabbit without waste.

Do you not like when people give you information you wanted?

Ill just paste what i already said which is that when you bring up multiple external factors to try to trump just one factor of course its gonna look like those multiple factors are more important, and they could be, but when i intentionally am only talking about the effects of one factor, and then you try to use multiple to refute the validity of it in a senario you made up, that just makes me think you didnt even understand the point of the post at all. But then in another thread you say you admitted that the post was just about one factor being pip efficiency, SO THEN WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO BRING OTHER FACTORS IN IT TO REFUTE THE EFFECTS OF JUST ONE FACTOR? It makes no sense.

and yes i get pip efficeincy is one of those factors in you're formula but you are using multiple other ones that i didnt even bring up in this post for the sole reasons above.

#203 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 22:29:37

Alias wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:
Alias wrote:

Yes. But even if we stay at equal cost he provided better example than I could come up with: suddenly rabbit berry pie ended up in top tier of his list. It gives 4x18 pips. But at the exact same cost (actually a bit less effort) you can get rabbit pie (4x14) plus 6 berries (6x5). It's better on bite count, total pip value and even on his precious pip efficiency. After all this talk he put THIS in top tier.

This has nothing to do with pip efficiency which is the whole reason for this post. I acknowledge other factors so this whole counter post argument is serving to do nothing but make you look like a asshole.

Let's keep it civil ok? Yes, your list was for food including all different factors, that's why I mentioned a few. Taking all into account, how exactly did you end up with rabbit berry pie as top tier?

The main factor was pip efficiency, and once or twice i talked about time, not compost, and not water, so bringing them up to refute it when i didnt bring them up myself just brings in unaccounted variables that i didnt even discuss in the first place. At that point i have no intentions of continuing the disscussion because what new variables you are bringing up wasnt what i was even talking about in the first place. So when you try to use that as a platform against the validity of just one factor being pip efficiency, all i can see from that is you wanna win a argument and not try to learn something new. This whole original post was me trying to experiment with different theories and see how they would behave against other foods, so forgive me if its not all 100% to your liking.

#204 Re: Main Forum » Pip efficiency (please read Crumpaloo) » 2019-01-18 22:20:05

Booklat1 wrote:

How i this irrelevant, I literally gave you a tool to calculate this

Crumpaloo wrote:

The main thing that bugs me is that i dont know where the thresh-hold for pip efficeincy goes off, i mean of course smaller items are more pip efficeint then larger ones, but how many smaller foods would you need to add until the amount of average waste the larger food wastes equals out to the average pip value of the a bunch of the smaller foods? difficult stuff...


This formula allows you to change the values of bites, food amount and waste (based on number of pips and your food levels), all vaues that you can change and plot on a graphic or just compare. You could potentially do it to every food in the game for every value of waste you desired. But fuck me for also considering costs in my formula, I guess, didn't have to overcomplicate.

When you bring up multiple external factors to try to trump just one factor of course its gonna look like those multiple factors are more important, and they could be, but when i intentionally am only talking about the effects of one factor, and then you try to use multiple to refute the validity of it in a senario you made up, that just makes me think you didnt even understand the point of the post at all. But then in another thread you say you admitted that the post was just about one factor being pip efficiency, SO THEN WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO BRING OTHER FACTORS IN IT TO REFUTE THE EFFECTS OF JUST ONE FACTOR? It makes no sense.

#205 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 22:09:38

Booklat1 wrote:
Alias wrote:
Booklat1 wrote:

Also, for one soil and one bowl of water you can make 48 food worth of popcorn. For 1 water you can make 160 worth of mutton pie. You have to waste more than a third of the pies for popcorn to be on their level. That's why you consider the other factors, crumpaloo, you don't just dismiss them.

Yes. But even if we stay at equal cost he provided better example than I could come up with: suddenly rabbit berry pie ended up in top tier of his list. It gives 4x18 pips. But at the exact same cost (actually a bit less effort) you can get rabbit pie (4x14) plus 6 berries (6x5). It's better on bite count, total pip value, yum (2 different foods, 3 with bowl of berries), and even on his precious pip efficiency. After all this talk he put THIS in top tier.


I compared both with my formula and even with a waste of 3 pips in each bite of rabbit pie it's still better than berry rabbit without waste.

Im confused, so did you or did you not already admit to knowing the post was only about pip efficiency? Bringing up other factors when you openly acknowledged that you understood why i wasn't bring them up just makes no sense unless you are pretending you dont for the sake of arguing. In which case i think im done here...

#206 Re: Main Forum » New Players Bad for Villages? » 2019-01-18 22:04:33

alphabetter wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:
DestinyCall wrote:

I'm no longer new and I can't speak for every new player, but back when I first started, I managed to survive to 60 as a berry tender and successfully raised a handful of babies during my first play session.   Admittedly, that was after five or six early deaths, but only the first one was avoidable.  The rest happened because I was born to neglectful (or fatally wounded) mothers.

However, I owe that long life in large part to my uncle, who taught me about berry plants and showed me a safe way to help our village.   I doubt I would have lived that long without his help, because I was not very good at watching my temp as a noob.   I will still teach berry tending as a first lesson, if someone is brand new.  Keeps them in the village and close to a reliable food source, so the chance of accidental death by starvation or cold is reduced (unless the berry patch is built over tundra).

In that teaching i probably could of planted 20 berry bushes. Teaching a new player something you could of already done in the time it takes to teach them is just being lazy and looking for someone else to do it.

i think you are SEVERELY overestimating time it takes to teach a new player anything. i taught someone to berry farm earlier in less than five minutes. including getting soil from out of town. if you can honestly say you can plant twenty berry bushes in less than five minutes, while fetching soil and not relying on compost someone else made, then surely your time shouldnt be wasted on this game.

it really doesnt take long to stop and tell someone 'hey, when bushes turn brown, scoop up the soil, put it on the plant, do the same with water, and youre good to go'. most of the time, you can do this while nursing the kid, then get back to your task- be it cooking, composting, whatever- once the kid gets hair. it's not hard, and it doesnt take that long, like you're trying to insinuate.

Really just depends on whats already available to start farming but your taking my point to litterally, what im implying is that time teaching is wasting your time that you could be spending to do stuff thats directly helping the village, teaching someone basically turns you into just as much dead weight as the noob until you are done teaching him, and whos to say you would be even teaching him one thing? Most noobs need to learn several things at once so if you REALLY want to help a new player out your gonna be there alot longer then you think.

Mainly i just wish the tutorial teaches people more, its in-game doesnt require you wasting time in a village, and has all the info you need. People shouldnt have to be forced into teaching roles just because someone was too lazy to go out and learn this stuff themselves.

#207 Re: Main Forum » Pip efficiency (please read Crumpaloo) » 2019-01-18 21:59:04

Booklat1 wrote:

you do realize this is a formula to show you not only the average but worst and best case waste scenarios for each food with or without costs, right? You can still compare the waste of foods for each bte based on the amount of food the person has and disconsidering the costs. Toy with the formula a bit, I don't think you realize this is actually what you wanted.

Well its kinda hard to with both you and Alis shoving so much irrelevant information in my face.

#208 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 21:54:09

Alias wrote:
Booklat1 wrote:
Alias wrote:

Make all the popcorn you want. Milk will always give more food, no matter how "pip efficient" popcorn is. Even if you fed theoretical family of only newborns, milk will always give them more food than popcorn from the same amount of corn. And this is impossible, worst case. You can be efficient at minimizing waste, I will be efficient at maximizing actual calories intake with all waste factored in.

Also, for one soil and one bowl of water you can make 48 food worth of popcorn. For 1 water you can make 160 worth of mutton pie. You have to waste more than a third of the pies for popcorn to be on their level. That's why you consider the other factors, crumpaloo, you don't just dismiss them.

Yes. But even if we stay at equal cost he provided better example than I could come up with: suddenly rabbit berry pie ended up in top tier of his list. It gives 4x18 pips. But at the exact same cost (actually a bit less effort) you can get rabbit pie (4x14) plus 6 berries (6x5). It's better on bite count, total pip value and even on his precious pip efficiency. After all this talk he put THIS in top tier.

This has nothing to do with pip efficiency which is the whole reason for this post. I acknowledge other factors so this whole counter post argument is serving to do nothing but make you look like a asshole.

#209 Re: Main Forum » Pip efficiency (please read Crumpaloo) » 2019-01-18 21:47:19

Booklat1 wrote:

Your original post suggested combos with green beams, of course we were going to tell you there are better foods. I read both posts, you intended to create some system to eat foods without waste and make combos. Great, but it'll be terrible if you use bad food for it.

The whole combos thing was never the main idea of the post, the title even says "pip efficiency"

#210 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 21:44:09

Booklat1 wrote:

Yes alias, it is ridiculous to waste corn with popcorn when you have milk because it's a waste to make a food that produces less food.
Pip efficiency is not a very good metric for waste and that is the point.

Saying mutton pies are "not that bad" and milk is wasteful is wrong. Well, sure, you may lose some of the pips drinking milk, but how much milk did you make in the first place?

I get it, this post is about pips not used. It gives however, wrong ideas about the importance of this.


So you, knowing that i was only talking about pips not being used, and not getting the wrong idea about the importance of this factor above others, STILL make posts about this factor being not as important? So you were pretending this whole time to not understand the meaning of my post so you could go on to make posts that try to demean the value of it when i never claimed the importance of this subject as a whole? Then going on to say that people may get the wrong idea when you yourself have pretended not to? What the actual fk man...

#211 Re: Main Forum » Pip efficiency (please read Crumpaloo) » 2019-01-18 21:26:37

Booklat1 wrote:

Your conclusions under the assumptions you took are what I and everyone else is telling you about though. They are wrong.

You insist mutton pie is wasteful. It's not. You waste food just by making berry rabbit pies. I'm not saying pip efficiency and waste aren't relevant, I am and everyone else was telling you to stop lookin at it alone and consider all the other various factors you mentioned (which my formula does and your posts did not).

The metric of pip efficiency is of fringe importance compared to costs, which I just demonstrated and you said you disconsidered. Again, mutton pie is a byproduct of compost that only really costs 0,25 water. Every single pip of it cost less than those of a berry rabbit pie, no matter how you look at it. It's better with and without waste. If we remove the soil cost of both pies we still have mutton with 160 food per water and berry rabbits with 57 for berry rabbit. That's without the soil cost, crumpaloo. Soil that is made in the same process that gives you mutton and dough.


You are defending youself saying I'm adding information you never brought up and these are exactly all the other factors that are important. These other factors not only matter but they show how little does "we should eat this pie at 1 life" weight compared to mutton pie being one of the biggest exploits in this game. My "cut and dry formula" demonstrates the opposite of what you failed to do when you "had a brain fart" trying to prove mutton was bad. I'm not getting nitty gritty with details, I'm telling you that the ideas you brought are incorrect and why.

Or would you rather keep paying 5 times as much resources to make food?

Im not nor have i ever denied the importance of other factors, i simply made a post 90% about pip efficiency.

If you wanna talk about cost, time, or something else entirely go right ahead, otherwise if your trying to refer to my posts that only cover one of these factors compared to the rest, then i think your confusing the entire point of the original post.

#212 Re: Main Forum » New Players Bad for Villages? » 2019-01-18 21:04:11

DestinyCall wrote:
Léonard wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:

That would require noobs to not die before they could have babies

Alright show me the proof that noobs die before they can have babies every single time.
I'm waiting.

I'm no longer new and I can't speak for every new player, but back when I first started, I managed to survive to 60 as a berry tender and successfully raised a handful of babies during my first play session.   Admittedly, that was after five or six early deaths, but only the first one was avoidable.  The rest happened because I was born to neglectful (or fatally wounded) mothers.

However, I owe that long life in large part to my uncle, who taught me about berry plants and showed me a safe way to help our village.   I doubt I would have lived that long without his help, because I was not very good at watching my temp as a noob.   I will still teach berry tending as a first lesson, if someone is brand new.  Keeps them in the village and close to a reliable food source, so the chance of accidental death by starvation or cold is reduced (unless the berry patch is built over tundra).

In that teaching i probably could of planted 20 berry bushes. Teaching a new player something you could of already done in the time it takes to teach them is just being lazy and looking for someone else to do it.

#213 Re: Main Forum » New Players Bad for Villages? » 2019-01-18 21:01:15

Booklat1 wrote:

at least new players don't waste food making berry rabbit pies

Trust me they make back for that 10 fold

#214 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 20:58:31

Booklat1 wrote:

read my post, please. you'll waste food making berry rabbit pies long before you eat them if you don't. Even with waste you get rabbit pies + bowl of berries being about as efficient as rabbit berry pies with no waste. There is math to prove that. You need to eat all rabbit pies at 10 pips for this combo to be equally as bad as a non-wasted berry rabbit pie.



Cost >>>>>> waste

Just replied to it and ill tell you what i did. Which is that i never claimed not wasting food was more important overall, and that i have already admitted other factors being important, so you trying to prove a point wrong that im not subscribed to its just as pointless as that formula you made...

#215 Re: Main Forum » Pip efficiency (please read Crumpaloo) » 2019-01-18 20:54:15

Booklat1 wrote:

This post is to respond Crumpaloo's second post of pip efficiency, but most importanly, some statements regarding mutton pie. But first a few points:

Crumpaloo wrote:

Got alot of info from the previous post so i thought id try to add and reorganize my thoughts on it in a separate one

So what ive learned so far is:

.Most people Start eating when they have about 2-4 pips left

.The less pips per bite a food has, the less pips it could potentially waste, however that does NOT mean you should completely disregard high pip foods

.A high pip value is not always 100% a wasteful thing, because most people eat between 2-4 pips a food that can give 18-16 pips would be ideal

.Foods that advertise to give 20 pips can only give 19 at most because the player can only have 20 pips in their pip meter max making them always waste at least one pip

. Alot more factors then just the pip efficiency affect the validity of any given food, however pip efficiency still has a substantial role in this


You said most people eat at 2-4 pips. That is bad data. You can't use data you gathered from forums alone to speak for most of the players. Most payers here are good. In fact, I'm sure noobs waste far more. This is a good point for your theory actually ( if you disconsider noobs also don't usually eat foods like milk)


That being said, how do you know how much food is being wasted each time?
Well, lets take a food with F total food for example. That food value is based on a cost so all F / C = cost efficiency. But Crumpaloo is right, from that value some can always be wasted (W). So F - W / C = Actual cost efficiency. Actual cost efficiency is the metric we should use to evaluate a food. If a food gets you 60 pips, has an average waste of 20 and costs 1 it's still more eficient then a food that costs 2 and has no waste. It's 40 against 30. 20 pips wasted weight less than doubling the cost.


Also, lets think of a food like mutton pie, 4 bites of 15. You get at least 4 food from each pie, each bite is wasted independently, so we can more accuratly represent the formula as number of bites x (pip per bite - Waste) / Cost = actual food efficiency. More bites per food amount does mean
more efficiency. Imagine how inneficient would mutton pie be if it was a pie with one bite of 60.


But how can we know how much a food will be wasted based on it's pip per bite? Take all the positive results of (- maximum number of pips + average number of pips when eating + pip per bite). If we assume most players are noobs and eat pies at half food it's a waste of 5 for each bite eaten (unlike 50 if pies only had one bite)

We have now a more accurate food value of each food in which Number of bites x (pips per bite - (- maximum food + average number of pips when eating + Number of pips). This is without the costs for the food, the closes to pure pip efficiency this far. Bear in mind you only use this formula when overeating, as its made to calculate the positive pip distance from the maximum when eating.




However, and this is where you should just really pay attention crumpaloo, lets add all costs together with an average wasting of 0 for berry rabbit pie. i'll round all costs to their water and soil equivalents when possible. Dough will only have it's water cost counted, and rabbits and mutton will have their costs ignored.  Costs for using ovens are also ignored.


Rabbit berry pie with no waste:
4 x 18 / 0.25 dough + bowl of berries + rabbit. Since the costs can also be in soil/water we get 4 x 18 / 0.25 bowl of water +1 bowl of water + bowl of soil = 72/ 1,25 bowl of water + 1 bowl of soil

Mutton berry pie eaten at 10 pips:
4 x 10 / 0.25 dough + mutton. Converting it we get: 40 / 0.25 bowl of water

rabbit berry pie at 10 pips:
4 x 10/ 1,25 water + 1 bowl of soil

Eating a cooked rabbit at 10 pips + a bowl of berries:
10 (from the rabbit) + 6 x 5  /1 bowl of soil + 1 bowl of water


Rabbit pie eaten at 10 + berry bowl
4 x (14 -4) + 30 / 1 bowl of soil + 1.25 bowl of water
70 /1 bowl of soil + 1.25 bowl of water




Even at 0 waste berry rabbit pies are more costly then mutton pies with a 1/3 of waste. Berry rabbit pies are so so bad because it's just better to make a rabbit pie and eat the berries. In fact, like someone else told you in your second post, even with maximum waste it's beter to eat 6 x 1 + 4 x 1 from bowl of berries + rabbit pie than it is to eat 4 x 1 from rabbit berry pie. You may achieve no waste with extreme micromanagement by eating berry rabbit bowls, but that doesn't reflect in efficient usage of resources. In fact you'll waste food the moment you turn berries and rabbits into berry rabbit pies as you'd have to assume maximum efficiency from berry rabbit to beat rabbit pie + berries eaten at 10 pips. And it only beats it by 2 pips.

Ok the reason its at 2-4 pips and not something else IS because of the data i got and yeah sure more non-noobs are on this forum but noobs can still understand they need to eat at x amount of pips, this usually happens when the audio queue for being hungry goes off, this tells both noobs and non-noobs alike that its time to go eat which happens at around, you guessed it 2-4 pips. So no, you dont gotta be some super vet to get a audio queue that tells you when to eat.

Also trying to find the average amount of waste of a food is pointless, theres alot more factors that can lead to waste then just oh its pip value is x so it wastes y, thats not how it works, ive said in numerous posts that theres other factors and you even admitted yourself, this cut and dry formula is going to give you more incorrect information. So trying to nail down a ever changing factor is like hitting a bulls eye that always moves away from your dart.

As for the whole accounting for soil and water thing, good on ya, however my argument was never accounting for soil and water because unlike the point your trying to make, it was about how the bigger a item is, the more likely it was to be wasted, NOT about these external factors that you are only now bringing up, you wanna get into the nitty gritty? Sure go right ahead, just dont expect me to try to defend a point that you made up.

#216 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 20:29:44

Alias wrote:
Gederian wrote:

I think you are both right and just mad at each other.

Pies are needed when traveling and are a byproduct so you must make them. You got off on the wrong foot here, arguing two different points.

The low pip vs high pip argument is probably mute anyways. You can't really control the major variable (what people eat) so just preach about YUM! Berry in bowl is not the same as berry in hand!

Let's just all be friends and do octo eves!

Agreed. That's why when producing it's good to focus on maximum results at minimum cost. You can provide foods optimized for least waste or optimized for full bellies at similar cost. Latter is better, because that's  the thing  that counts in  the game. If youcan make your village overflow with food from milk, mutton pie and turkey then you are all good and your family is set to die of nocturnal infertility and not of starvation tongue

Sure if you wanna make a crap ton of milk and pies go ahead thats not what im arguing, my point is that you can make as much of them as you want, they are still going to be wasteful and so far apart from changing their pip values i havent seen another way to make them. Also if you make popcorn and pies at the same rate and cost its doesnt make sense to go with pies, at that point youd just be losing pips for the sake of arguing. If you wanna talk about pip efficiency thats one thing, but you gotta either bring in the rest of the variables that go along with it, or talk about that subject by itself, trying to do both at once is just counter intuitive and im pretty sure thats the main reason you've been arguing at me for so long about this, :L

#217 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 20:24:11

Booklat1 wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:

Not gonna argue that making bread and mutton instead of the pies themselves is not just losing pips, although i wont agree that mutton pies are a good food choice overall, the number of pips your average player eats at doesnt line up nicely with mutton pies which makes it very easy to waste alot of it if you dont wanna be bothered looking for another food. Considering everyone has access to your food supply its best to assume worst case scenario.


yes, because you keep disconsidering cost efficiency, a much more relevant metric in favour of "eating berry rabbit pies allows you to not waste a pip)

I've made a formula to evaluate how much food you lose based on average pips when eating, maximum pips per bite and cost. I hope you'll realize how very absurdly wrong you are about mutton pies.


Eh mutton pies are very wasteful, but its fine because you can make so many to outweight that so that ill agree with you on, but what are you talking about with formulas? Are you trying to say you have one or that i do? tbh just confused what u saying...

#218 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 20:21:08

Gederian wrote:

I think you are both right and just mad at each other.

Pies are needed when traveling and are a byproduct so you must make them. You got off on the wrong foot here, arguing two different points.

The low pip vs high pip argument is probably mute anyways. You can't really control the major variable (what people eat) so just preach about YUM! Berry in bowl is not the same as berry in hand!

Let's just all be friends and do octo eves!

I aint gonna lie, yum bonus is legit

#219 Re: Main Forum » New Players Bad for Villages? » 2019-01-18 17:01:14

happynova wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:

Right because i the sole creator of this train of thought will single handedly drive off the entire future playerbase of this game because of one thread post. Are you really that dense? Or are you just trying to manipulate my thoughts into your own twisted logic to some how make me this big bad person that somehow through sheer will alone is gonna just completely ruin the game for everyone, when greifers have been trying to do that ever since the game has come out? If hundreds of greifers over the course of numerous months couldn't break the game, neither can one person sporting a controversial opinion so get your head screwed on straight and come at me with a actual solid argument with evidence and proof, not this mess of a attempt at throwing shade.

I'm sorry, I would, but my ability to take you seriously has just completely imploded.

Yeah the moment i saw that post you made i was thinking the exact same, thought i could logic it out but apparently your only response is this, oh well!

#220 Re: Main Forum » New Players Bad for Villages? » 2019-01-18 16:59:21

The_Anabaptist wrote:

Alright Crumpaloo after looking at some of your other threads, I imagine that you consider yourself a fine swiss watchmaker.  Somebody who cares deeply about every pip of food and that it is allocated in a perfect bite every time.  Somebody whom wants to see an entire town of sims dance in a perfect weave of motion and purpose.  Except that ain't life.

In all actuality, we probably aren't that far off in our desire to see town running at peak efficiency, but our methods of getting there are vastly different.  I'm going to take a moment to troll you here, and I'm saying it up front so everyone knows that I'm intending to only lightheartedly tease you.  You know who else would count out every pip of food for their populous?  Communists!  So start your bread line comrade!  (Or kraut, as you have already done that!)  You know who else preached euthanasia of the weak?  Nazis!  Clearly them noob babies had it coming!  With enough propaganda, one day you'll have your glorious fatherland.  Even if it is only for an hour!

The_Anabaptist

The ironic thing is people are talking about my argument as if im already killing,not feeding noobs, guess some people are just blind to their rage idk.

#221 Re: Main Forum » New Players Bad for Villages? » 2019-01-18 16:56:22

Léonard wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:

im making a good argument and any actual counter points dont exist.

Ah yes, sorry I didn't realize you had an iq of 9 billion and that your arguments are the perfect embodiment of logic itself.
Hey, you ever thought that uhm, maybe, any towns directly benefit from having noobs simply because they allow you to continue your lineage in the first place?
I don't know, perhaps, if say, you killed every noob, your town would utterly die in no time?
You ever thought of that?
But I don't know, you're the genius, you tell me who is actually thinking rationally here.

So this is your "social experiment" here?
You just post a bunch of nonsense, claim they are absolute indisputable facts and laugh when people tell you you're just being selfish?
What's next, are you going to tell me that your "social experiment" worked perfectly because you "predicted" people would call you an asshole?

That would require noobs to not die before they could have babies, also your cringe attempt at assuming what im going to say next is probably the most off-putting thing ive read.

#222 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 16:49:47

Alias wrote:
DestinyCall wrote:

I'm not worried about the math error you made in your initial post.  I'm worried that you are still arguing that mutton pie is not a good food choice overall.  You are still claiming that it might get wasted by inconsiderate or lazy villagers.  The point of my post was that even in an absolute worst case scenario, mutton pies are superior to the available alternative.   

There is a problem at the core of your food theory and the math related to mutton pies helps to illustrate it in a very clear way.   I think you really need to take a step back and re-think your approach to pip efficiency if you want to identify which foods are really best for the village.

This. He will not abandon his "pip efficiency" theory. He created his own food benchmark where he claims that pip efficiency if key factor, but each tier in this benchmark has foods with both high and low "pip efficiency", showing that its non-factor.

But the best part is him putting rabbit berry pie in top tier. This is 4x18 and is huuuge waste on all fronts. With the same ingredients and less effort you can create rabbit pie which is 4x14 and still have bowl of goose berries so 6x5. This option is faster, gives more total pips, is more "pip efficient" and gives more bites.
And yet he put rabbit berry pie at the top smile Bravo!

Sorry, Crumpaloo, but it seems there's something lacking in your knowledge and approach to the game. You messed up how skim milk is made, same for pies in this thread, ommited total plant output when comparing beans and corn, admitted you can eat pie twice cause you don't care and now glorify pie that is sin to make like potatoes. More and more people tell you that, but you create more and more topics and posts in response. You might have many hours in the game, but your posts question how they were spent.

Ok if your saying that i believe that pip efficiency is the key factor to which foods are the best overall, and then claim thats i went back on that because im adding 18 pip pies at the top of my foods list, then you haven't been reading my post.

I have said numerous times that pip efficiency isn't the end all be all so trying to tell me something i dont find to be true is just misleading. Also i dont know how re-instigating an argument by talking to someone about me is progressive in any sense of the word, all your doing is making up misleading conclusions about what im thinking and then using those false beliefs as a support for an argument that makes no sense whatsoever.

If you really wanna hear what my proof of behind what im ACTUALLY saying then look at the post, i said that while pip efficiency leads to less pips wasted if you can account for the average number of pips a person has left when they start looking to eat food then  subtract that by the max amount of pips a player can have on them at any given point which is 20, then you can use foods that would be considered more wasteful to actually end up saving more pips because you have accounted for it already.

As for that last bit i already refuted all of those points in a earlier post and you never replied back to them so idk why you are bringing them up again, and so far only two people have told me that, you, and destiny whom ive already replied to. Yeah i dont know how to make everything in this game, but that doesnt make what im saying any less valid if ive got the proof to back it up which i do, so instead of skimming over that and coming to your own conclusion, try to look at it from a neutral perspective instead of the one you got right now.

#223 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 16:33:09

DestinyCall wrote:

I'm not worried about the math error you made in your initial post.  I'm worried that you are still arguing that mutton pie is not a good food choice overall.  You are still claiming that it might get wasted by inconsiderate or lazy villagers.  The point of my post was that even in an absolute worst case scenario, mutton pies are superior to the available alternative.   

There is a problem at the core of your food theory and the math related to mutton pies helps to illustrate it in a very clear way.   I think you really need to take a step back and re-think your approach to pip efficiency if you want to identify which foods are really best for the village.

yeah and i agreed that the alternative was not as good as the mutton pies about 3 times now so at this point your just confusing me.

#224 Re: Main Forum » Pip Efficiency Pt.2 » 2019-01-18 01:58:43

DestinyCall wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:

Gotta disagree with the whole more bites the better theroy, other guy tried to argue that point and i just told him this. If you had one food with 1 pip, you could add as many uses to that food as you wanted, as long as the pip value of the food remains the same, the bites wont have any affect, this shows that bites/uses of a food are solely dependent of the pip value of the food itself, think of it like a multiplier, you can multiply any number by zero, but so long as its zero, the number doesn't  matter. Another way to thiink of it is like the flat bonus jason added to the game, it goes on top of the base values after the fact.

Not gonna argue that making bread and mutton instead of the pies themselves is not just losing pips, although i wont agree that mutton pies are a good food choice overall, the number of pips your average player eats at doesnt line up nicely with mutton pies which makes it very easy to waste alot of it if you dont wanna be bothered looking for another food. Considering everyone has access to your food supply its best to assume worst case scenario.

Dear god.   Talking to you is like throwing rubber balls at a brick wall.   

The number of total bites is critical.  Look at the numbers again.   When you make those ingredients into food, you can either end up with 12 bites of food with a total pip value of 112 (bread and cooked mutton) or 16 bites of food with a total pip value of 240 (mutton pies).  If someone eats food in the most wasteful way possible (by eating a bite with only one spent hunger pip), each wasteful bite would only provide 1 pip, regardless of the max value of the food. 

In that case, you could get 16 pips out of the mutton pies and 12 pips from the mutton and bread.  Pies still come out ahead.   Of course, you could argue that you "lost" more by wasting the mutton pies (224 pips lost vs 100 lost), but that is completely meaningless when you consider that by making roast mutton and bread, you would already be sacrificing 128 pips due to opportunity cost.   The mutton and bread is more wasteful AND gives fewer total pips.  Inefficiency related to over-consumption has no impact on this situation.   It does not matter. 

Worst case scenario ... you should still make mutton pies instead of cooking the raw ingredients seperately.  Always.  Even if you are feeding crazy, over-eating babies and stubborn old people who hate berries.    Mutton pies are just that good.

Ugh i dont know why you are repeating the same point over and over again, yes when i wrote that part of the post i had a brain fart, and took that part down shortly after finding out, so bringing up the same point to tell me that im wrong about what i already admitted to saying to be wrong is just rude and unnecessary. Yeah i get it that the mutton pie has more bites then the bread and cooked mutton together but none of that matters in the first place because how many pips you are already losing by making them instead of the pies. So why are you beating a dead horse??

#225 Re: Main Forum » New Players Bad for Villages? » 2019-01-18 01:46:02

happynova wrote:
Crumpaloo wrote:

While i highly doubt just myself could have any effect on the playerbase just through my ramblings if some how it still manage to have an impact, this could take weeks, or even months of constant playing on my part to establish a pattern of that magnitude into that many players which i dont know if im gonna be even playing the game that long so why at the point would i even care what happens?

LOL!  By your logic, that sounds like those of us who are intending to keep playing long-term should probably stab you before you get a chance to drive off the newbies who will benefit us.  If we were all as self-centered as you.

Right because i the sole creator of this train of thought will single handedly drive off the entire future playerbase of this game because of one thread post. Are you really that dense? Or are you just trying to manipulate my thoughts into your own twisted logic to some how make me this big bad person that somehow through sheer will alone is gonna just completely ruin the game for everyone, when greifers have been trying to do that ever since the game has come out? If hundreds of greifers over the course of numerous months couldn't break the game, neither can one person sporting a controversial opinion so get your head screwed on straight and come at me with a actual solid argument with evidence and proof, not this mess of a attempt at throwing shade.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB